Working together for standards The Web Standards Project


Buzz Archives for August 2002

Building A Better Lizard

Mozilla 1.1 has been officially released, and now stalks the countryside spreading improved support for CSS, HTML and DOM. In addition to a number of DHTML-targeted performance enhancements, Mozilla sports a suite of cool developer tools (like the ever-improving Venkman JavaScript debugger and DOM Inspector) and welcome user interface ...

By Scott Andrew LePera | Filed in Browsers

But it will be unexciting and I will lose customers…wrong!

The W3C QAIG released a useful set of talking points for dealing with recalcitrant standards opponents.

By Steven Champeon | Filed in Web Standards (general)

W3C to Write Clearer Guidelines?

Yesterday, August 26, 2002, the Quality Assurance (QA) Working Group released a Working Draft of the specification guidelines for QA Framework. The goal of this document is to provide a framework for all Working Groups within the W3C to write "clearer, more implementable, and better testable technical reports." Will this honestly ...

By Molly E. Holzschlag | Filed in W3C/Standards Documentation

BT Does Not Own the Web

The lawsuit filed by British Telecom, claiming it has a patent on hyperlinks, has been kicked out of court.

By Steven Champeon | Filed in Web Standards (general)

4.6 out of 100 W3C Members Comply

Do W3C member organizations follow W3C recommendations? Marko Karppinen wanted to know. Six months ago, Marko tested all 506 W3C member sites and found that only 18 used valid HTML or XHTML. Put another way, only 3.7% of W3C members followed W3C recommendations. Put yet another way, 96.3% of W3C ...

By Jeffrey Zeldman | Filed in Web Standards (general)

Opera 7 all new engine? “Better” DOM support?

That's what Paul Festa reports in his August 20th article, Opera casts off legacy code for speed. Many of us have hoped that Opera would listen to the numerous complaints about lack of DOM support for their otherwise very good browser. Many developers out there may feel that Paul's article ...

By Shirley Kaiser | Filed in Browsers

Hotmail Versus Mozilla

Justin Skolnick points out that Hotmail, or more properly, Passport, is rejecting Mozilla (gif) as not being a "current Web browser". Funny, you'd think that after four and a half years, Microsoft would have heard of Mozilla by now. Or maybe they're just upset about the whole AOL/Mac thing...

By Steven Champeon | Filed in Browsers

AOL now with Gecko!

AOL released a new version of their software that is based on Mozilla's Gecko rendering engine, for the Macintosh. A good sign for those who want to build a single site that works in AOL and in standards-compliant browsers.

By Steven Champeon | Filed in Browsers

Bank Idiocy

At home in Canada I bank with a perfectly respectable institution called CIBC, been a customer for a while, even use their online stockbroker. Until now. I've switched to a Macintosh and none of the browsers on OS X (IE, Mozilla, you name it) can get into the online trading ...

By Tim Bray | Filed in Browsers

The Webmonkey Talks Standards

Paul Boutin has written a wonderful new article for Webmonkey: Web Standards for Hard Times. In it, Paul makes the case for using standards (it actually saves time and money!), explains the ins and outs of the the DOCTYPE declaration, and preaches the importance of validating your markup and CSS. ...

By Eric Costello | Filed in Web Standards (general)

Bobby Bought

Bobby, the accessibility validator created by Cast.org, has been acquired by Watchfire, maker of web management solutions. (Hat tip: Tiffany Brown.) [Update: Bobby is now WebXACT.]

By Jeffrey Zeldman | Filed in Accessibility

CSS 2.1

As if XHTML 2.0, XHTML 1.0 2/e, and the prospect of tableless search portals was not enough for you, now there is a new version of the CSS 2 Recommendation for your perusal.

By Steven Champeon | Filed in CSS

XHTML 2.0

The W3C has published the XHTML 2.0 Working Draft. No DTDs or Schemae yet, but they say they will be forthcoming once the language stabilizes. It is worth noting that the introduction explicitly states that it is not intended to be backwards compatible with the earlier versions of HTML and ...

By Steven Champeon | Filed in HTML/XHTML, W3C/Standards Documentation

New Zealand Promotes Web Standards

New Zealand's e-government initiative has published its Web Guidelines, which include an endorsement of the use of standards such as CSS, XML, and the WAI, the Web Accessibility Initiative. Thanks to Richard Hulse for the pointer.

By Steven Champeon | Filed in Accessibility, Web Standards (general)

One of the common complaints about building Web applications (either client-side or those that use both client and server as platforms for development) is the difficulty that comes along with debugging them. In the cover story in this month's New Architect, this correspondent discusses some tips for managing the debugging ...

By Steven Champeon | Filed in General

Ars Technica Reviews Mozilla

Ars Technica has released a detailed review of Mozilla, not just from the perspective of whether it is good enough to make you finally switch to a browser that understands and supports Web standards, but also discusses whether it is a success as a product of their original mission. Contains ...

By Steven Champeon | Filed in General

XHTML 1.0, Second Edition

XHTML 1.0 Second Edition has left the building. It’s not a revision to XHTML, but simply the latest version of W3C’s official documentation about the XHTML 1.0 standard. Among other things, this version finally includes a warning about the optional XML declaration that wreaks havoc with many browsers old and ...

By Jeffrey Zeldman | Filed in HTML/XHTML, W3C/Standards Documentation

The Web Standards Project is a grassroots coalition fighting for standards which ensure simple, affordable access to web technologies for all.

Recent Buzz

WCAG 2.0 resources

By Bruce Lawson | November 6th, 2008

Here’s a starter list of some resources to help transition to WCAG 2 from the world of WCAG 1, now the new standard goes to proposed recommendation status.

This is just a starter list; please add other resources that you recommend in the comments. It would be great to have some for clients as well as hard-core techies.

Filed in Accessibility, W3C/Standards Documentation, Web Standards (general) | Comments (9)

More Buzz articles

Title Author
WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed recommendations Bruce Lawson
Acid3 receptions and misconceptions and do we have a winner? Lars Gunther
UK government draft browser guidance is daft browser guidance Bruce Lawson
Call-to-action: Save the UT Accessibility Institute James Craig

All of the entries posted in WaSP Buzz express the opinions of their individual authors. They do not necessarily reflect the plans or positions of the Web Standards Project as a group.

This site is valid XHTML 1.0 Strict, CSS | Get Buzz via RSS or Atom | Colophon | Legal