Working together for standards The Web Standards Project

Who Needs JAWS?

By Ian Lloyd | September 1st, 2003 | Filed in Accessibility

Skip to comment form

So, web developers need to get a copy of JAWS to know that their web site sounds right? As covered in a previous post, this is not necessarily the case (although it is undoubtedly a ‘nice-to-have’). As Mark points out, we should develop to standards, not to specific technology (otherwise we would all be developing for IE/Win and nothing else); he also suggests some other resources that developers can, and should, try out if they cannot afford a full copy of JAWS.

This morning I was going to re-purpose an earlier piece I wrote ‘Accessibility Testing On A Budget‘ to focus purely on the specifics of screen readers and to further address the current JAWS debate. However, I noticed this morning that Kynn Bartlett (who was very opposed to the petition’s existence) has somewhat reduced the neccessity for such a piece with his piece ‘A Web Designer’s Guide To JAWS‘. Topics include ‘How can I design for JAWS?’, ‘What are my alternatives to JAWS?’, ‘How do I get JAWS users to test my site?’

Meanwhile, W3C and WAI bod Matt May suggests that Freedom Scientific, the makers of JAWS, could at the very least offer a web-based service that spits out speech like a real copy of JAWS would. It might not be ideal for more interactive sites (and by that I mean where the users has to do anything above simply sitting back and listening, e.g. filling in a form), but it would be a step in the right direction.

Return to top

Post a Reply

Comments are closed.

All of the entries posted in WaSP Buzz express the opinions of their individual authors. They do not necessarily reflect the plans or positions of the Web Standards Project as a group.

This site is valid XHTML 1.0 Strict, CSS | Get Buzz via RSS or Atom | Colophon | Legal