Comments on: Browser Junkies, Get a New Fix http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: E. H. aka ZeHoS http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2035 E. H. aka ZeHoS Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:30:31 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-2035 Er, Julian.... where... /me blinks hard. Where's the smiley face in that screenshot!? Does your browser seriously not render the image at all? (I know IE5 doens't like PNG files, but one would at least expect to see other parts of the image) /me blinks again, just to make sure. ZS Er, Julian…. where…
/me blinks hard.
Where’s the smiley face in that screenshot!? Does your browser seriously not render the image at all? (I know IE5 doens’t like PNG files, but one would at least expect to see other parts of the image)

/me blinks again, just to make sure.

ZS

]]> By: Julian Bennett Holmes http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-187 Julian Bennett Holmes Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:02:23 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-187 John, That's true. <a href="http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h189/julianbennettholmes/Picture1.png" rel="nofollow">Here's my screenshot of Internet Explorer 5 for Mac's result of the Acid 2 Test</a> John,

That’s true.
Here’s my screenshot of Internet Explorer 5 for Mac’s result of the Acid 2 Test

]]> By: Grayson Mixon http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173 Grayson Mixon Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:13:54 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-173 The Firefox rendering engine is being completely rewritten for 3.0. It is very close to passing, much closer than 2.0. Check out the trunk nightlies if you want to see the 3.0 work. Mozilla expects 3.0 to pass acid2. and 2.0a1 doesn't fail too badly. it is much closer than, say, IE. The Firefox rendering engine is being completely rewritten for 3.0. It is very close to passing, much closer than 2.0. Check out the trunk nightlies if you want to see the 3.0 work. Mozilla expects 3.0 to pass acid2.

and 2.0a1 doesn’t fail too badly. it is much closer than, say, IE.

]]> By: John http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-172 John Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:59:18 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-172 Julian, Not as miserably as it could. Besides, the Firefox team has made it clear that while Acid2 perfection would (rather, will) be nice, it is not their current focus. Julian,

Not as miserably as it could. Besides, the Firefox team has made it clear that while Acid2 perfection would (rather, will) be nice, it is not their current focus.

]]> By: Julian Bennett Holmes http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-171 Julian Bennett Holmes Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:32:59 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-171 On the Acid 2 test, it fails miserably. <a href="http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h189/julianbennettholmes/Picture13.png" rel="nofollow">check out my screenshot</a> Yeah, I'd say that's a pretty bad fail. On the Acid 2 test, it fails miserably.
check out my screenshot

Yeah, I’d say that’s a pretty bad fail.

]]> By: Greg http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-168 Greg Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:13:34 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-168 How does it do in the Acid test? How does it do in the Acid test?

]]> By: Stuart Maynard-Keene http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-160 Stuart Maynard-Keene Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:24:46 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-160 I like it, the bookmarks being in SQLLite is really handy when searching for that elusive link! I like it, the bookmarks being in SQLLite is really handy when searching for that elusive link!

]]> By: Ian Lloyd http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-159 Ian Lloyd Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:39:51 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-159 Like David said, Elmer, this version of Firefox is not for you. Stick to v1.5 Like David said, Elmer, this version of Firefox is not for you. Stick to v1.5

]]> By: David Owens http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-158 David Owens Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:17:40 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-158 Hi Elmer, If you are a beginner, I reccomend you stick to Firefox 1.5 <a href="http://www.getfirefox.com" rel="nofollow">Get Firefox</a>. This release is aimed at developers and is nowhere near a finished product. Hi Elmer,

If you are a beginner, I reccomend you stick to Firefox 1.5 Get Firefox. This release is aimed at developers and is nowhere near a finished product.

]]> By: ionut http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/bon-echo-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-156 ionut Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:44:59 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/22/browser-junkies-get-a-new-fix/#comment-156 The new Bon Echo Alpha 1 sounds interesting! The new Bon Echo Alpha 1 sounds interesting!

]]>