<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acid2 and Opera 9 Clarifications: Yes, Opera 9 Passes the Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/</link>
	<description>Working together for standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cornell</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-53631</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-53631</guid>
		<description>Jack, Konqueror passed ACID2 because Apple has to send patches upstream due to the GPLv2.  They fullfil their legal obligation, and are responsible specifically for furthering CSS standards adherence.  Apple doesn&#039;t use KDE&#039;s Subversion or CVS, so the extra features they do add are a little harder to remerge, especially given the fact that Cocoa/Obj-C is almost exclusively permeated throughout Mac OS X, while QT is cheifly C++.  WebCore however cross pollinates both business model driven communities.  Firefox 2 does not pass ACID2, and its UI toolkit still non-native on all platforms.  Mozilla, IE6, IE7, Netscape and pre-Opera 9 don&#039;t pass ACID2 either.  Now if JavaScript standards existed and were enforced, currently I have to use Firefox more often since it has all the developer addons, which make debugging crazy AJAX scripts easier on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, Konqueror passed ACID2 because Apple has to send patches upstream due to the GPLv2.  They fullfil their legal obligation, and are responsible specifically for furthering CSS standards adherence.  Apple doesn&#8217;t use KDE&#8217;s Subversion or CVS, so the extra features they do add are a little harder to remerge, especially given the fact that Cocoa/Obj-C is almost exclusively permeated throughout Mac OS X, while QT is cheifly C++.  WebCore however cross pollinates both business model driven communities.  Firefox 2 does not pass ACID2, and its UI toolkit still non-native on all platforms.  Mozilla, IE6, IE7, Netscape and pre-Opera 9 don&#8217;t pass ACID2 either.  Now if JavaScript standards existed and were enforced, currently I have to use Firefox more often since it has all the developer addons, which make debugging crazy AJAX scripts easier on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khaled khalil</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-48354</link>
		<dc:creator>khaled khalil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-48354</guid>
		<description>sorry, seems that the opera linux problem was mine, a friend confirmed to me that it worked perfectly on his opera linux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, seems that the opera linux problem was mine, a friend confirmed to me that it worked perfectly on his opera linux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khaled khalil</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-48351</link>
		<dc:creator>khaled khalil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-48351</guid>
		<description>sadly, opera linux didn&#039;t render it just like its windows release, but i am sure they will soon approve it.

i confirm that konqueror passed it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sadly, opera linux didn&#8217;t render it just like its windows release, but i am sure they will soon approve it.</p>
<p>i confirm that konqueror passed it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-32322</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-32322</guid>
		<description>Konqueror has passed the test since version 3.5. It was the second browser, after Apple&#039;s Safari, to pass the test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Konqueror has passed the test since version 3.5. It was the second browser, after Apple&#8217;s Safari, to pass the test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-22722</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-22722</guid>
		<description>Will Firefox 3.0  pass the Acid2 browser test?

One of the things that has bothered Firefox&#039;s creators has been it&#039;s inability to pass the Acid2 browser test. A recent alpha release of Firefox 3.0 has been able to pass thanks to changes in it&#039;s rendering engine. Now Firefox can pass it will join the likes of Safari and Opera in being able to say it is truely (or at least as near as possible) standards compliant. And, of course this puts them another step ahead of Microsoft with Internet Explorer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Firefox 3.0  pass the Acid2 browser test?</p>
<p>One of the things that has bothered Firefox&#8217;s creators has been it&#8217;s inability to pass the Acid2 browser test. A recent alpha release of Firefox 3.0 has been able to pass thanks to changes in it&#8217;s rendering engine. Now Firefox can pass it will join the likes of Safari and Opera in being able to say it is truely (or at least as near as possible) standards compliant. And, of course this puts them another step ahead of Microsoft with Internet Explorer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La nueva versión de Firefox pasa por fin el Acid Test 2 - aNieto2K</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-19026</link>
		<dc:creator>La nueva versión de Firefox pasa por fin el Acid Test 2 - aNieto2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-19026</guid>
		<description>[...] Parece ser que la versión de día 7 de Diciembre de 2006 de lo que será el nuevo Firefox ha pasado el Acid2 test, esto se debe a la nueva versión de Gecko (la 1.9) que pasará a ser el nuevo corazón de Firefox.&#160; Aunque otro navegadores como Opera 9 tambien lo pasó este verano, esto es una gran noticia. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Parece ser que la versión de día 7 de Diciembre de 2006 de lo que será el nuevo Firefox ha pasado el Acid2 test, esto se debe a la nueva versión de Gecko (la 1.9) que pasará a ser el nuevo corazón de Firefox.&nbsp; Aunque otro navegadores como Opera 9 tambien lo pasó este verano, esto es una gran noticia. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-17511</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-17511</guid>
		<description>When I use the latest Opera 9, the Acid face looks fine until I change the screen size from maximum to... anything else... whereof the top of it&#039;s head breaks off, looking a bit like he has a hat hovering over his head... does this means something is wrong, because it looks wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I use the latest Opera 9, the Acid face looks fine until I change the screen size from maximum to&#8230; anything else&#8230; whereof the top of it&#8217;s head breaks off, looking a bit like he has a hat hovering over his head&#8230; does this means something is wrong, because it looks wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swarvek</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-15431</link>
		<dc:creator>Swarvek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-15431</guid>
		<description>What you reference to as a bug is not really a bug. This effect you get is due to fixed positioning. If you go back and click on the test again it will show correctly. Because there is no scrolling provided on the page you cannot go to the exactly the same spot on the page. Two blocks that &quot;mess up&quot; the test as you have put it have style set position:fixed and the keep position relative to the vieport not the document. When you resize the window opera seems to scroll document a bit (possibly to show as much of the anchor as possible or center it on the screen) and that messes up the looks. If you dont believe me measure the distance between the top egde of the viewport and the eyes (in the picture) - it will change as you resize the window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you reference to as a bug is not really a bug. This effect you get is due to fixed positioning. If you go back and click on the test again it will show correctly. Because there is no scrolling provided on the page you cannot go to the exactly the same spot on the page. Two blocks that &#8220;mess up&#8221; the test as you have put it have style set position:fixed and the keep position relative to the vieport not the document. When you resize the window opera seems to scroll document a bit (possibly to show as much of the anchor as possible or center it on the screen) and that messes up the looks. If you dont believe me measure the distance between the top egde of the viewport and the eyes (in the picture) &#8211; it will change as you resize the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-13386</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-13386</guid>
		<description>I dont understand. When I use Opera and resize the window manually (grabing the corner and resizing) it messes up the test. 

So i guess Opera does not really pass then eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand. When I use Opera and resize the window manually (grabing the corner and resizing) it messes up the test. </p>
<p>So i guess Opera does not really pass then eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/comment-page-1/#comment-10695</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 08:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/20/acid2-and-opera-9-clarifications/#comment-10695</guid>
		<description>Congrats for OPERA Team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats for OPERA Team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.330 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-02 13:02:46 -->