Comments on: Firefox Security Update http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Molly E. Holzschlag http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3205 Molly E. Holzschlag Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:41:47 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/#comment-3205 The true answer is that Mozilla sends us regular press updates and I happened to be available to blog that news on that day. The true answer is that Mozilla sends us regular press updates and I happened to be available to blog that news on that day.

]]> By: Britney’s Blog » Archives » Firefox Security Update http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3075 Britney’s Blog » Archives » Firefox Security Update Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:39:29 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/#comment-3075 [...] Firefox Security Update [...] [...] Firefox Security Update [...]

]]> By: Keith Bowes http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2941 Keith Bowes Fri, 04 Aug 2006 02:56:25 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/#comment-2941 Fyrd and Peter, I think this announcement was made due to the high usage of Firefox. It is the second most used browser behind IE, all others probably being negligible from a practical viewpoint. The surge in Firefox usage is significant from a standards viewpoint, so its updates and usage increases are relevant things to report here. The more standards-compliant browsers, the better. But not everyone interested necessarily uses it (I don't but I'm still glad MS is being challenged). Fyrd and Peter, I think this announcement was made due to the high usage of Firefox. It is the second most used browser behind IE, all others probably being negligible from a practical viewpoint. The surge in Firefox usage is significant from a standards viewpoint, so its updates and usage increases are relevant things to report here. The more standards-compliant browsers, the better. But not everyone interested necessarily uses it (I don’t but I’m still glad MS is being challenged).

]]> By: Peter http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2927 Peter Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:13:57 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/#comment-2927 It's odd alright, especially considering that since Firefox 1.5, the automatic update actually works and updates the browser without you having to do anything. Are you guys going to announce the release of Firefox 1.5.0.6 today? :) It’s odd alright, especially considering that since Firefox 1.5, the automatic update actually works and updates the browser without you having to do anything. Are you guys going to announce the release of Firefox 1.5.0.6 today? :)

]]> By: draco http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2734 draco Sat, 29 Jul 2006 05:14:14 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/#comment-2734 I think the automated update is already released since I've gotten mine 1-2 days ago. I think the automated update is already released since I’ve gotten mine 1-2 days ago.

]]> By: Thomas Tallyce http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2719 Thomas Tallyce Fri, 28 Jul 2006 22:16:14 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/#comment-2719 What's this got to do with Web Standards? What’s this got to do with Web Standards?

]]> By: Fyrd http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/comment-page-1/#comment-2714 Fyrd Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:00:23 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/07/28/firefox-security-update/#comment-2714 I'm curious as to why the WASP announces the smallest Firefox updates when they are released, yet when Opera 9 was officially released there was not a single post about it. Nothing against Firefox, but it seems a little odd. I’m curious as to why the WASP announces the smallest Firefox updates when they are released, yet when Opera 9 was officially released there was not a single post about it.

Nothing against Firefox, but it seems a little odd.

]]>