Comments on: CSS Turns 10 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: wkz0712 » Blog Archive » CSS十年 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-54340 wkz0712 » Blog Archive » CSS十年 Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:11:27 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-54340 [...] CSS Turns 10 | CSS10: Ten Year Anniversary of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) [...] [...] CSS Turns 10 | CSS10: Ten Year Anniversary of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) [...]

]]> By: sandwiches http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-53475 sandwiches Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:28:29 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-53475 CSS1 and CSS2 seem to have gone from working draft to recommendation in about a year. 2.1 was (apparently) started in 2002 and is still a working draft four years later. &#104ttp://sandwiches.elol.org What’s that all about? Why have we all been howling at Microsoft for sitting on their hands all this time, but giving W3C an easy ride CSS1 and CSS2 seem to have gone from working draft to recommendation in about a year. 2.1 was (apparently) started in 2002 and is still a working draft four years later. &#104ttp://sandwiches.elol.org What’s that all about? Why have we all been howling at Microsoft for sitting on their hands all this time, but giving W3C an easy ride

]]> By: Ellen http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-52204 Ellen Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:36:42 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-52204 To think what the web would be witout CSS makes me laugh I am glad it came along when it did and look forward to the day when it turns 50 years old. To think what the web would be witout CSS makes me laugh I am glad it came along when it did and look forward to the day when it turns 50 years old.

]]> By: Aukcje http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-47942 Aukcje Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:43:43 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-47942 Hello, If someone searches Polish translating this article: <a href="http://www.subasta.pl/10-urodziny-css.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.subasta.pl/10-urodziny-css.html</a> Greertings from Poland Hello,

If someone searches Polish translating this article:
http://www.subasta.pl/10-urodziny-css.html

Greertings from Poland

]]> By: Karl Dubost, W3C http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-40357 Karl Dubost, W3C Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:08:00 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-40357 Chris, I have <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2007/01/standard_organizations_history" rel="nofollow">answered to your comment on the QA Weblog</a>. The simple answer lies in "we have a tendency to forget that organizations and technological developments have an history. The requirements have changed." Chris,

I have answered to your comment on the QA Weblog. The simple answer lies in “we have a tendency to forget that organizations and technological developments have an history. The requirements have changed.”

]]> By: Akaash Maharaj http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-36228 Akaash Maharaj Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:22:50 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-36228 I hate to be a naysayer (yet I obviously do not hate it enough to stay my comments), but does it not strike anyone else as supremely ironic that the CSS10 web site created to celebrate the CSS anniversary uses an *invalid* cascading style sheet? As of today (18h18 EST, 21 January 2007) the W3 validator returns the following error for CSS10's cascading style sheet: "110 - #navigation li - Invalid number : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn't exist : 0 2px 4px #000". Perhaps that is tje best possible indication of how dismissive even the architects of web standards are of their own creation! Take care, Akaash _____ Web Site: http://www.maharaj.org/ Blog: http://www.maharaj.org/blog.shtml RSS: http://www.maharaj.org/rdf.xml . I hate to be a naysayer (yet I obviously do not hate it enough to stay my comments), but does it not strike anyone else as supremely ironic that the CSS10 web site created to celebrate the CSS anniversary uses an *invalid* cascading style sheet?

As of today (18h18 EST, 21 January 2007) the W3 validator returns the following error for CSS10′s cascading style sheet: “110 – #navigation li – Invalid number : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn’t exist : 0 2px 4px #000″.

Perhaps that is tje best possible indication of how dismissive even the architects of web standards are of their own creation!

Take care,
Akaash

_____

Web Site: http://www.maharaj.org/
Blog: http://www.maharaj.org/blog.shtml
RSS: http://www.maharaj.org/rdf.xml

.

]]> By: zwolu http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-34785 zwolu Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:46:12 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-34785 Happy Birthday and thank you CSS! Happy Birthday and thank you CSS!

]]> By: La domo de karotoj » CSS estas dek jaraĝa http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28220 La domo de karotoj » CSS estas dek jaraĝa Mon, 01 Jan 2007 08:04:22 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-28220 [...] Laŭ blogero en WaSP CSS estas dek jaraĝa. Tio estas bonega! Ankaŭ bonega estas, ke TTT-legiloj jam plejparte komprenas la nivelon unuan de CSS (CSS1). Nun se universitatoj, kolegioj kaj altlernejoj efektive konvene instruus ĝin… Komentoj (0) | Reenaĵoj (0) [...] [...] Laŭ blogero en WaSP CSS estas dek jaraĝa. Tio estas bonega! Ankaŭ bonega estas, ke TTT-legiloj jam plejparte komprenas la nivelon unuan de CSS (CSS1). Nun se universitatoj, kolegioj kaj altlernejoj efektive konvene instruus ĝin… Komentoj (0) | Reenaĵoj (0) [...]

]]> By: Chris Hunt http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-23830 Chris Hunt Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:19:22 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-23830 Not wanting to rain on the parade, but that timeline does point up how painfully slow the W3C process is these days. CSS1 and CSS2 seem to have gone from working draft to recommendation in about a year. 2.1 was (apparently) started in 2002 and is still a working draft four years later. What's that all about? Why have we all been howling at Microsoft for sitting on their hands all this time, but giving W3C an easy ride? Not wanting to rain on the parade, but that timeline does point up how painfully slow the W3C process is these days.

CSS1 and CSS2 seem to have gone from working draft to recommendation in about a year. 2.1 was (apparently) started in 2002 and is still a working draft four years later. What’s that all about? Why have we all been howling at Microsoft for sitting on their hands all this time, but giving W3C an easy ride?

]]> By: Joppe Houpt http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/comment-page-1/#comment-23251 Joppe Houpt Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:20:25 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/12/20/css-turns-10/#comment-23251 Hi! Concratulation indeed CSS! I'm big fan of using CSS without images. Several succesfull designs are allready made by me. Up to the next year. Cheers, Joppe Hi!

Concratulation indeed CSS! I’m big fan of using CSS without images. Several succesfull designs are allready made by me.

Up to the next year.

Cheers,
Joppe

]]>