Comments on: Apollo alphas released http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Pascal http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57981 Pascal Wed, 30 May 2007 19:00:50 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57981 This looks promising i agree, eventhough Macromedia central applications will not (yet) run within Apollo. Looking foreward so seeing this mature. Cant wait for the Linux version. This looks promising i agree, eventhough Macromedia central applications will not (yet) run within Apollo. Looking foreward so seeing this mature. Cant wait for the Linux version.

]]> By: » Blog Archive » Apollo alphas released http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57865 » Blog Archive » Apollo alphas released Tue, 01 May 2007 18:21:06 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57865 [...] Original post by http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/ [...] [...] Original post by http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/ [...]

]]> By: Mike http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57849 Mike Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:43:30 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57849 thanks for your informations @ John, the link to the webkit faqs are difficult to found at the labs page. thanks for your informations @ John, the link to the webkit faqs are difficult to found at the labs page.

]]> By: Denise http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57758 Denise Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:59:15 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57758 Has been a long time in the coming but I am happy Adobe releases Apollo and it is finally here, although I consider it a Macromedia made product and like to congratulate those who put thier time and dedication into this wonderful program. Has been a long time in the coming but I am happy Adobe releases Apollo and it is finally here, although I consider it a Macromedia made product and like to congratulate those who put thier time and dedication into this wonderful program.

]]> By: John Dowdell http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57370 John Dowdell Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:39:01 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57370 For "Why Webkit?", the FAQ has info: http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo:DeveloperFAQ#Why_did_Adobe_choose_WebKit (It was small, well-structured, and already had mobile capability.) For sourcecode, the HTML/JS model is intrinsically exposed, and the Flex model is optionally exposed... you can put a little "View Source" in the context menu, but don't have to. jd/adobe For “Why Webkit?”, the FAQ has info:
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo:DeveloperFAQ#Why_did_Adobe_choose_WebKit

(It was small, well-structured, and already had mobile capability.)

For sourcecode, the HTML/JS model is intrinsically exposed, and the Flex model is optionally exposed… you can put a little “View Source” in the context menu, but don’t have to.

jd/adobe

]]> By: Luis http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57333 Luis Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:18:38 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57333 Why have to be webkit based? I think it would be better in gecko don't you? Why have to be webkit based? I think it would be better in gecko don’t you?

]]> By: Joe http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57330 Joe Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:53:29 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57330 Looks very promising. I'm a little confused. I watched the eBay demo application movie and they are able to view the applications source code. Will all applications built with Apollo have the source code available? Looks very promising. I’m a little confused. I watched the eBay demo application movie and they are able to view the applications source code. Will all applications built with Apollo have the source code available?

]]> By: Wendy Carlyle » Blog Archive » Apollo alphas released http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57307 Wendy Carlyle » Blog Archive » Apollo alphas released Wed, 21 Mar 2007 06:51:55 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57307 [...] Apollo alphas released [...] [...] Apollo alphas released [...]

]]> By: enefekt http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57300 enefekt Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:24:32 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57300 <em>So this is an Adobe equivalent of XULrunner?</em> Sort of. Except Adobe actually has a plan of maintaining and promoting reuse and sharing of one instance of the runtime. Mozilla's strategy is to have you roll your own, and bundle the XULRunner runtime in for each application. So this is an Adobe equivalent of XULrunner?

Sort of. Except Adobe actually has a plan of maintaining and promoting reuse and sharing of one instance of the runtime.

Mozilla’s strategy is to have you roll your own, and bundle the XULRunner runtime in for each application.

]]> By: Robin http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/comment-page-1/#comment-57299 Robin Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:51:58 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/03/19/apollo-alphas-released/#comment-57299 So this is an Adobe equivalent of XULrunner? So this is an Adobe equivalent of XULrunner?

]]>