Comments on: Browser, Standards and Interop Summit in Paris http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Frits date blog http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-58269 Frits date blog Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:18:51 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/#comment-58269 Great idea to bring participants from Opera Software, Mozilla, Microsoft Corporation and others together. That is also what should happen with the browsers. They should join and create a standard so there won't be major differences between them. The presentation may be different but the handling of for example frames must come much closer. Great idea to bring participants from Opera Software, Mozilla, Microsoft Corporation and others together. That is also what should happen with the browsers. They should join and create a standard so there won’t be major differences between them. The presentation may be different but the handling of for example frames must come much closer.

]]> By: Dominic Shiells http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-57933 Dominic Shiells Thu, 17 May 2007 19:00:03 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/#comment-57933 Will it be podcasted like Media 2006? Will it be podcasted like Media 2006?

]]> By: Chris http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-57918 Chris Mon, 14 May 2007 10:25:03 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/#comment-57918 The basic issue is the lack of true support to already existing standards. SyncML was a great idea, but I've yet to see an implementation that is ready for practical use. Since I can't attend, it would be greatd if somebody would ask that questions in the Q&A session. The basic issue is the lack of true support to already existing standards. SyncML was a great idea, but I’ve yet to see an implementation that is ready for practical use.

Since I can’t attend, it would be greatd if somebody would ask that questions in the Q&A session.

]]> By: adactio http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-57910 adactio Fri, 11 May 2007 16:15:20 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/#comment-57910 The hCalendar events on this page are using the hyphenated short-form of the datetime abbreviation pattern: YYYY-MM-DD. That's not inaccessible. Of course if we're going to have a discussion defining what "accessible" means (as if it were something binary that's either on or off) then that would be an interesting debate... for another time and place, not here. The hCalendar events on this page are using the hyphenated short-form of the datetime abbreviation pattern: YYYY-MM-DD. That’s not inaccessible.

Of course if we’re going to have a discussion defining what “accessible” means (as if it were something binary that’s either on or off) then that would be an interesting debate… for another time and place, not here.

]]> By: Ben 'Cerbera' Millard http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/comment-page-1/#comment-57909 Ben 'Cerbera' Millard Fri, 11 May 2007 12:41:47 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2007/05/11/browser-standards-and-interop-summit-in-paris/#comment-57909 Dissension in the ranks! You're using an <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/2007/04/27/haccessibility/" rel="nofollow">accessibility-unfriendly Microformat</a>. Dissension in the ranks! You’re using an accessibility-unfriendly Microformat.

]]>