<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOM Scripting: A Web Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/</link>
	<description>Working together for standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-62269</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/#comment-62269</guid>
		<description>Nice touch if everyone got together one more time in a pub to discuss and maybe plan another project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice touch if everyone got together one more time in a pub to discuss and maybe plan another project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Bowes</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-61784</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Bowes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/#comment-61784</guid>
		<description>Yeah, JavaScript and DOM have come a long way.  I remember the old DHTML days, especially Netscape 4&#039;s awful model.  Evangelism still needs to be done, however; we need consistency between implementations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, JavaScript and DOM have come a long way.  I remember the old DHTML days, especially Netscape 4&#8242;s awful model.  Evangelism still needs to be done, however; we need consistency between implementations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sander Aarts</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-61720</link>
		<dc:creator>Sander Aarts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/#comment-61720</guid>
		<description>Da&#039; ge bedáánkt zèt da wittû! (thanks!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Da&#8217; ge bedáánkt zèt da wittû! (thanks!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-61686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/#comment-61686</guid>
		<description>Michiel van der Blonk wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Isn’t it time for a standard API for JavaScript libraries?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I certainly think that would be a good idea and at the @media Ajax conference last November, I know that John Resig and Alex Russell were discussing this. If enough of us keeping nudging them (and other library authors), maybe this idea would get some legs.

Mark Wales wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A task-force is perhaps not needed, but there still needs to be a general education about not using inline JavaScript so that behaviour is separate from structure.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I couldn&#039;t agree more. And is this is a discussion that occurs at the intersection of JavaScript and markup, I think it&#039;s one that will be better tackled by the WaSP as a whole rather than a JavaScript-only task force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michiel van der Blonk wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Isn’t it time for a standard API for JavaScript libraries?</p></blockquote>
<p>I certainly think that would be a good idea and at the @media Ajax conference last November, I know that John Resig and Alex Russell were discussing this. If enough of us keeping nudging them (and other library authors), maybe this idea would get some legs.</p>
<p>Mark Wales wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>A task-force is perhaps not needed, but there still needs to be a general education about not using inline JavaScript so that behaviour is separate from structure.</p></blockquote>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. And is this is a discussion that occurs at the intersection of JavaScript and markup, I think it&#8217;s one that will be better tackled by the WaSP as a whole rather than a JavaScript-only task force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wales</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-61665</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/#comment-61665</guid>
		<description>A task-force is perhaps not needed, but there still needs to be a general education about not using inline JavaScript so that behaviour is separate from structure. I started reading PPK&#039;s book on JavaScript yesterday and it makes many important points. Yet when you go to websites there is almost no JavaScripting examples that &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt; use inline event handling. As a result the one JavaScript on my website is still using inline event handling, because until I finish reading PPK&#039;s book I can&#039;t work out how to do it properly.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A task-force is perhaps not needed, but there still needs to be a general education about not using inline JavaScript so that behaviour is separate from structure. I started reading PPK&#8217;s book on JavaScript yesterday and it makes many important points. Yet when you go to websites there is almost no JavaScripting examples that <em>don&#8217;t</em><em> use inline event handling. As a result the one JavaScript on my website is still using inline event handling, because until I finish reading PPK&#8217;s book I can&#8217;t work out how to do it properly.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michiel van der Blonk</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-61651</link>
		<dc:creator>Michiel van der Blonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/#comment-61651</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it time for a standard API for JavaScript libraries? It would make life so much easier if UI elements and the complete &#039;windowing&#039; system could be made a standard. We could start with bridge tools, and eventually all library writers would comply. Look at all the common elements: Event, Window, Document, Class, Element, Drag, Slider, Tooltip, Ajax, Date, Calendar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it time for a standard API for JavaScript libraries? It would make life so much easier if UI elements and the complete &#8216;windowing&#8217; system could be made a standard. We could start with bridge tools, and eventually all library writers would comply. Look at all the common elements: Event, Window, Document, Class, Element, Drag, Slider, Tooltip, Ajax, Date, Calendar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauldwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-61639</link>
		<dc:creator>pauldwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/02/20/dom-scripting-a-web-standard/#comment-61639</guid>
		<description>I’m curious to know what Blair Ballmer would look like.

On second thoughts, maybe I don’t want to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m curious to know what Blair Ballmer would look like.</p>
<p>On second thoughts, maybe I don’t want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.293 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-02 12:19:21 -->