<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcing the Adobe Task Force</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/</link>
	<description>Working together for standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Heimann</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-71422</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Heimann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-71422</guid>
		<description>Ok, hi @ all. I think that Adobe Reader should get some more little functions. Maybe extracted from Adobe Acrobat. I have to work everyday with this &quot;good job&quot; application. There are so many people who need to work everyday with this freeware tool produced by adobe, but i think that there are some missing parts which should be included in the Reader. At the very least, Adobe should create a small business solution for smaller companys. For example an adobe Acrobat light edition which is affordable for most people. Thx for reading my reply</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, hi @ all. I think that Adobe Reader should get some more little functions. Maybe extracted from Adobe Acrobat. I have to work everyday with this &#8220;good job&#8221; application. There are so many people who need to work everyday with this freeware tool produced by adobe, but i think that there are some missing parts which should be included in the Reader. At the very least, Adobe should create a small business solution for smaller companys. For example an adobe Acrobat light edition which is affordable for most people. Thx for reading my reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dns</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-71415</link>
		<dc:creator>Dns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-71415</guid>
		<description>It’s good that you’re spreading out to all of Adobe’s products, but Dreamweaver still needs a lot of work to make it encourage people to use web-standards. I gave up using it when I discovered standards as it just makes things more complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s good that you’re spreading out to all of Adobe’s products, but Dreamweaver still needs a lot of work to make it encourage people to use web-standards. I gave up using it when I discovered standards as it just makes things more complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-71287</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-71287</guid>
		<description>Including HomeSite is a good idea. Where can we apply for that? Hand Coding is still the cherry on the top of a good code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Including HomeSite is a good idea. Where can we apply for that? Hand Coding is still the cherry on the top of a good code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Schutzsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-71252</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Schutzsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-71252</guid>
		<description>This is terrific news!  I agree with may others sentiments on here but I think that maybe we haven&#039;t all been using the same DW?  I&#039;ve been teaching DW CS3 for a year now and its nothing but great for creating valid markup with very little necessity to hand code (which I have done since 1998).  So I am not sure where the disconnect is.  Maybe its in user training? Maybe folks just don&#039;t know the power thats already built into DW?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is terrific news!  I agree with may others sentiments on here but I think that maybe we haven&#8217;t all been using the same DW?  I&#8217;ve been teaching DW CS3 for a year now and its nothing but great for creating valid markup with very little necessity to hand code (which I have done since 1998).  So I am not sure where the disconnect is.  Maybe its in user training? Maybe folks just don&#8217;t know the power thats already built into DW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rum man</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-70988</link>
		<dc:creator>Rum man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-70988</guid>
		<description>Best wishes for a productive endeavor…if you can include HomeSite, that would be even more exciting for those of us handcoders who still love our favorite tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best wishes for a productive endeavor…if you can include HomeSite, that would be even more exciting for those of us handcoders who still love our favorite tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creativeuser</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-70623</link>
		<dc:creator>creativeuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-70623</guid>
		<description>I gave up using it when I discovered standards as it just makes things more complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up using it when I discovered standards as it just makes things more complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-70476</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-70476</guid>
		<description>It’s good that you’re spreading out to all of Adobe’s products, but Dreamweaver still needs a lot of work to make it encourage people to use web-standards. I gave up using it when I discovered standards as it just makes things more complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s good that you’re spreading out to all of Adobe’s products, but Dreamweaver still needs a lot of work to make it encourage people to use web-standards. I gave up using it when I discovered standards as it just makes things more complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-70475</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-70475</guid>
		<description>is there any non-obvious reason why my previous comment bemoaning the
lack of flashplayer for THE quintessential internet OS&#039;s, namely the BSD
derivatives, was removed ?
(free/net/open/dragonfly)
what use are webstandards when you can sit there with standards compliant
browser, fast and capable hardware and software that makes it work, and
still be unable to view a large proportion of the available content that&#039;s out there,
with many sites being completely unusable ?
am I assuming too much when I assume &quot;open&quot; and &quot;accessible&quot;
when the term &quot;web standards&quot; is mentioned ?
this is very much on-topic for this announcement.
any insight or comments gratefully received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any non-obvious reason why my previous comment bemoaning the<br />
lack of flashplayer for THE quintessential internet OS&#8217;s, namely the BSD<br />
derivatives, was removed ?<br />
(free/net/open/dragonfly)<br />
what use are webstandards when you can sit there with standards compliant<br />
browser, fast and capable hardware and software that makes it work, and<br />
still be unable to view a large proportion of the available content that&#8217;s out there,<br />
with many sites being completely unusable ?<br />
am I assuming too much when I assume &#8220;open&#8221; and &#8220;accessible&#8221;<br />
when the term &#8220;web standards&#8221; is mentioned ?<br />
this is very much on-topic for this announcement.<br />
any insight or comments gratefully received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jboy</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-67252</link>
		<dc:creator>jboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-67252</guid>
		<description>Nice to see it&#039;s still rolling on, but let&#039;s get a few things clear..

Homesite 5 (not the + version) needs to be brought back...i use it in Vista x64 it craps out a few times in a day. VS2005 or 2008 don&#039;t cut the formatting for classic ASP.

Please please please make this an agenda....hope Jeff is still on the team...

Long live Homesite i guess i could use DW and only code view...but it&#039;s a bit clunky.

Many thanks

jboy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see it&#8217;s still rolling on, but let&#8217;s get a few things clear..</p>
<p>Homesite 5 (not the + version) needs to be brought back&#8230;i use it in Vista x64 it craps out a few times in a day. VS2005 or 2008 don&#8217;t cut the formatting for classic ASP.</p>
<p>Please please please make this an agenda&#8230;.hope Jeff is still on the team&#8230;</p>
<p>Long live Homesite i guess i could use DW and only code view&#8230;but it&#8217;s a bit clunky.</p>
<p>Many thanks</p>
<p>jboy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattG</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/comment-page-1/#comment-64435</link>
		<dc:creator>MattG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/2008/03/10/announcing-the-adobe-task-force/#comment-64435</guid>
		<description>This should be a really good move for Adobe.  As others have commented there are some issues that need to be addressed, but for the most part I am happy with all of Adobe&#039;s current programs.  I am not a professional designer/coder by any means but I use Dreamweaver to build up sites for my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.experienced-people.co.uk/5002-home-based-business-ideas/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;home business&lt;/a&gt;.  While I do have to go through and clean up code here and there, I am happy with its features.  Hopefully the new Adobe Task Force will be able to take care of some of these issues and create an all around better software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be a really good move for Adobe.  As others have commented there are some issues that need to be addressed, but for the most part I am happy with all of Adobe&#8217;s current programs.  I am not a professional designer/coder by any means but I use Dreamweaver to build up sites for my <a href="http://www.experienced-people.co.uk/5002-home-based-business-ideas/" rel="nofollow">home business</a>.  While I do have to go through and clean up code here and there, I am happy with its features.  Hopefully the new Adobe Task Force will be able to take care of some of these issues and create an all around better software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.321 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-10-01 23:01:03 -->