http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-73052 adobe photoshop fan Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:36:16 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-73052 I agree opera 4 is great. I really dislike IE though. Thanks for all the info. I agree opera 4 is great. I really dislike IE though. Thanks for all the info.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-73043 my-music-school-echo Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:45:51 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-73043 I believe all the browsers are improving their performance and standards support and not just acid3 for the good of all web users present and future. Well, for opera 4, several bugs have been introduced into Opera since v3.6 accidently or in design. I believe all the browsers are improving their performance and standards support and not just acid3 for the good of all web users present and future. Well, for opera 4, several bugs have been introduced into Opera since v3.6 accidently or in design.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-72944 Kev Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:02:22 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-72944 Every browsers have made their own improvements but it takes time for everyone to catch up to pass the test... Thanks lars for sharing Every browsers have made their own improvements but it takes time for everyone to catch up to pass the test… Thanks lars for sharing

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-72905 Joaquín Núñez» Blog Archive » acid3 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:20:51 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-72905 [...] se liberó opera 10 alpha 1 no me demoré en hacer eco de que, esta nueva versión superaba el test acid3, pero que es el acid3 para quienes no lo [...] [...] se liberó opera 10 alpha 1 no me demoré en hacer eco de que, esta nueva versión superaba el test acid3, pero que es el acid3 para quienes no lo [...]

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-72757 izen Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:39:29 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-72757 Opera win! Opera 4 ever! I know it! Opera win! Opera 4 ever! I know it!

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-72638 Look what my RSS dragged in #7 November 2008 Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:35:08 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-72638 [...] Read: Acid3 receptions and misconceptions and do we have a winner? [...] [...] Read: Acid3 receptions and misconceptions and do we have a winner? [...]

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-72583 Web Design - ZachBrowne.com Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:44:37 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-72583 [...] Does this mean we should ditch Firefox, IE and all the other browsers in favour of Safari or Chrome, well no, and that’s what Lars Gunther is talking about in his article over at WaSP. [...] [...] Does this mean we should ditch Firefox, IE and all the other browsers in favour of Safari or Chrome, well no, and that’s what Lars Gunther is talking about in his article over at WaSP. [...]

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-72577 منتدى Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:51:51 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-72577 thanks lars thanks lars

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-72451 Restaurant Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:53:20 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-72451 Speaking from a pedagogic perspective it is also very clear that our Acid tests should have very clear visual clues to failing or not. I.e. “smoothness” is too subjective. I have linked to other test suites for JavaScript performance. They do a much better job at assessing script speed. WaSP Acid tests should be boolean by nature. They are more a lobbying and teaching effort, than anything else. Speaking from a pedagogic perspective it is also very clear that our Acid tests should have very clear visual clues to failing or not. I.e. “smoothness” is too subjective. I have linked to other test suites for JavaScript performance. They do a much better job at assessing script speed. WaSP Acid tests should be boolean by nature. They are more a lobbying and teaching effort, than anything else.

]]> http://www.webstandards.org/2008/10/02/dowehaveawinner/comment-page-1/#comment-72426 The Website Marketing Group » Blog Archive » Useful website Developer reading Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:08:36 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1157#comment-72426 [...] Acid3 receptions and misconceptions and do we have a winner? [...] [...] Acid3 receptions and misconceptions and do we have a winner? [...]

]]>