<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WCAG 2 and  mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed recommendations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/</link>
	<description>Working together for standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queensberry</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72620</link>
		<dc:creator>Queensberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72620</guid>
		<description>thx for the great work bruce. you have to work on the part 2 now ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thx for the great work bruce. you have to work on the part 2 now ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-11-20 &#124; Ip's.</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72615</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-11-20 &#124; Ip's.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72615</guid>
		<description>[...] WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed recommendations - The Web Standards Project &quot;WCAG 2 and the mobileOK Basic Tests specifications have been moved to “proposed recommendation status” by the W3C, which means that the technical material is complete and it has been implemented in real sites. &quot; (tags: accessibility webstandards WCAG wcag2 release article) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed recommendations &#8211; The Web Standards Project &quot;WCAG 2 and the mobileOK Basic Tests specifications have been moved to “proposed recommendation status” by the W3C, which means that the technical material is complete and it has been implemented in real sites. &quot; (tags: accessibility webstandards WCAG wcag2 release article) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billigflug</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72601</link>
		<dc:creator>Billigflug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72601</guid>
		<description>Beside all complaints that the WCAG 2 itself isn&#039;t accessible for all developers, this document should be added as well: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/
Sooner or later web developers have to deal with it, this is beyond question. Thus I appreciate to inform developers how to manage the switch to WCAG 2.0. 
But I really wonder why something that aims to ease peoples life has to be so complicated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beside all complaints that the WCAG 2 itself isn&#8217;t accessible for all developers, this document should be added as well:<br />
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/</a><br />
Sooner or later web developers have to deal with it, this is beyond question. Thus I appreciate to inform developers how to manage the switch to WCAG 2.0.<br />
But I really wonder why something that aims to ease peoples life has to be so complicated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design - ZachBrowne.com</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72585</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design - ZachBrowne.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72585</guid>
		<description>[...] 2.0. has now become a proposed recommendation. This means it is not only technically complete but has been successfully implemented on a large [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2.0. has now become a proposed recommendation. This means it is not only technically complete but has been successfully implemented on a large [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Lawson&#8217;s personal site&#160; : Accessibility and mobile standards; Veerle Pieters interview</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72456</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Lawson&#8217;s personal site&#160; : Accessibility and mobile standards; Veerle Pieters interview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72456</guid>
		<description>[...] It may be of interest to you that WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed W3C recommendations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It may be of interest to you that WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed W3C recommendations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blawson</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72445</link>
		<dc:creator>blawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72445</guid>
		<description>Of course, Paul: good point. So I&#039;ve started off a list of &lt;a href=&quot;/2008/11/06/wcag-20-resources/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recommended WCAG 2 resources&lt;/a&gt; for the community to build.

Thanks for suggesting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Paul: good point. So I&#8217;ve started off a list of <a href="/2008/11/06/wcag-20-resources/" rel="nofollow">recommended WCAG 2 resources</a> for the community to build.</p>
<p>Thanks for suggesting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nortypig &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WCAG 2 Proposed Recommendation</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72428</link>
		<dc:creator>nortypig &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WCAG 2 Proposed Recommendation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72428</guid>
		<description>[...] WCAG 2 has moved to Proposed Recommendation status and so has the lesser known MobileOK Basic Tests recommendation. The Web Standards Project (WaSP) have posted the announcement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WCAG 2 has moved to Proposed Recommendation status and so has the lesser known MobileOK Basic Tests recommendation. The Web Standards Project (WaSP) have posted the announcement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul D. Waite</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72427</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul D. Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72427</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But if your site was developed with an eye to real accessibility for real people rather than as a compliance issue, you should find that there is little difference.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Your clients might start asking about WCAG 2 though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But if your site was developed with an eye to real accessibility for real people rather than as a compliance issue, you should find that there is little difference.</p></blockquote>
<p>Your clients might start asking about WCAG 2 though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.312 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-10-01 22:47:07 -->