<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WebAIM screenreader survey&#8230;the results are in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webstandards.org/2009/01/31/webaim-screenreader-survey-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2009/01/31/webaim-screenreader-survey-results/</link>
	<description>Working together for standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2009/01/31/webaim-screenreader-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-73446</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1488#comment-73446</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that Flash breaks accessibility so much as most Flash developers break accessibility.

We&#039;ve got over the idea that HTML is a visual medium, so standards-aware designers know how to markup for semantics, which can then be extracted by assistive technology.

But I&#039;d suggest that most Flash developers still see it as a visual medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that Flash breaks accessibility so much as most Flash developers break accessibility.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve got over the idea that HTML is a visual medium, so standards-aware designers know how to markup for semantics, which can then be extracted by assistive technology.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;d suggest that most Flash developers still see it as a visual medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2009/01/31/webaim-screenreader-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-73433</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1488#comment-73433</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting the results of the survey of screen reader preferences.......we hope this information will help to improve new versions of the screen reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting the results of the survey of screen reader preferences&#8230;&#8230;.we hope this information will help to improve new versions of the screen reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2009/01/31/webaim-screenreader-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-73430</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1488#comment-73430</guid>
		<description>Great information, and it will enable those web designers highly focus on accessibility to create even better experience for screen reader users.

Sad to see Flash still breaks accessibility...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information, and it will enable those web designers highly focus on accessibility to create even better experience for screen reader users.</p>
<p>Sad to see Flash still breaks accessibility&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wait till I come! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TTMMHTM: Screen Readers, Superheroes and a broken DOM</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2009/01/31/webaim-screenreader-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-73426</link>
		<dc:creator>Wait till I come! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TTMMHTM: Screen Readers, Superheroes and a broken DOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1488#comment-73426</guid>
		<description>[...] WaSP reporting on the findings or WebAim&#8217;s Screen Reader Survey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WaSP reporting on the findings or WebAim&#8217;s Screen Reader Survey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2009/01/31/webaim-screenreader-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-73399</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1488#comment-73399</guid>
		<description>When I saw the title, I thought it was about a web-based UI to AIM.  LOL!

Most of this data is encouraging.  I wonder how hard it would be to uninstall Flash (I do so easily, but I&#039;m sighted).

It would be nice to know how many screenreaders implement the HTML 4 accessibility features and if they&#039;re actually good outside of theory or if they&#039;ve had to invent their own accessibility features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the title, I thought it was about a web-based UI to AIM.  LOL!</p>
<p>Most of this data is encouraging.  I wonder how hard it would be to uninstall Flash (I do so easily, but I&#8217;m sighted).</p>
<p>It would be nice to know how many screenreaders implement the HTML 4 accessibility features and if they&#8217;re actually good outside of theory or if they&#8217;ve had to invent their own accessibility features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.277 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-10-01 22:40:09 -->