<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML5 logo: W3C takes a step in the right direction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webstandards.org/2011/01/28/html5-logo-w3c-takes-a-step-in-the-right-direction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2011/01/28/html5-logo-w3c-takes-a-step-in-the-right-direction/</link>
	<description>Working together for standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajeet</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2011/01/28/html5-logo-w3c-takes-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-77284</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=2008#comment-77284</guid>
		<description>I was part of the &quot;wave of negative feedback concerning the HTML5 logo.&quot; Thank you very much. Glad to help :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was part of the &#8220;wave of negative feedback concerning the HTML5 logo.&#8221; Thank you very much. Glad to help :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marietta Remodeler</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2011/01/28/html5-logo-w3c-takes-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-77190</link>
		<dc:creator>Marietta Remodeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 01:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=2008#comment-77190</guid>
		<description>Great post.  As my grandma used to say, &quot;we all gotta pick our battles&quot;.  Like the last posters comments about why they may have picked this battle.  At the end of the day, it won&#039;t accomplish much, where as focusing energy on across the board standards, like ya&#039;ll do, that makes good sense.  Communication between humans is hard enough, we need systems and formats that make it easier to get on the same page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  As my grandma used to say, &#8220;we all gotta pick our battles&#8221;.  Like the last posters comments about why they may have picked this battle.  At the end of the day, it won&#8217;t accomplish much, where as focusing energy on across the board standards, like ya&#8217;ll do, that makes good sense.  Communication between humans is hard enough, we need systems and formats that make it easier to get on the same page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Bilicki III</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2011/01/28/html5-logo-w3c-takes-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-77153</link>
		<dc:creator>John A. Bilicki III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=2008#comment-77153</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s at a minimal a marketing stunt and none of the reasons the excessive number of large words add up mathematically speaking for removing the version number; it really seems to come down to from what I&#039;ve read that the WHATWG had mild to harsh disagreements with the W3C and decided to take their own route. It&#039;s a symbolic move to say they work on &quot;HTML&quot; instead of HTML5 as in the idea that they have taken over all of the work on HTML as a whole (e.g. HTML 1~5) thus somehow superseding the W3C.

I&#039;m still calling HTML5 HTML5 because that&#039;s what it is. People will still use HTML 4.01 and 3.2 in example long in to the lifespan and beyond HTML5 and 6. Removing the number doesn&#039;t serve any useful technical functionality or benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s at a minimal a marketing stunt and none of the reasons the excessive number of large words add up mathematically speaking for removing the version number; it really seems to come down to from what I&#8217;ve read that the WHATWG had mild to harsh disagreements with the W3C and decided to take their own route. It&#8217;s a symbolic move to say they work on &#8220;HTML&#8221; instead of HTML5 as in the idea that they have taken over all of the work on HTML as a whole (e.g. HTML 1~5) thus somehow superseding the W3C.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still calling HTML5 HTML5 because that&#8217;s what it is. People will still use HTML 4.01 and 3.2 in example long in to the lifespan and beyond HTML5 and 6. Removing the number doesn&#8217;t serve any useful technical functionality or benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention HTML5 logo: W3C takes a step in the right direction - The Web Standards Project -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.webstandards.org/2011/01/28/html5-logo-w3c-takes-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-77135</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention HTML5 logo: W3C takes a step in the right direction - The Web Standards Project -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 23:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webstandards.org/?p=2008#comment-77135</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by karannnnnnnnnnn3 and FMC Washington DC, sin3rss. sin3rss said: HTML5 logo: W3C takes a step in the right direction: After receiving a wave of negative feedback concerning the ... http://bit.ly/hDZZ0y [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by karannnnnnnnnnn3 and FMC Washington DC, sin3rss. sin3rss said: HTML5 logo: W3C takes a step in the right direction: After receiving a wave of negative feedback concerning the &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/hDZZ0y" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/hDZZ0y</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.295 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-10-01 22:24:01 -->