Comments on: IE 7 Beta Preview 2 Out Now http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bruce http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-22489 Bruce Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:20:57 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-22489 The line of the day goes like this, "Hello Mr customer, why don't you _upgrade_ to firefox..you see for one it actually works, two it's free and three is supports SVG" Opera or Firefox!! and one more thing, no more branch coding, am sick of branch coding, from now on it's just tough, W3C standards and nothing else. Maybe we need a standards group for implementing the standards from the standards group. The line of the day goes like this, “Hello Mr customer, why don’t you _upgrade_ to firefox..you see for one it actually works, two it’s free and three is supports SVG”

Opera or Firefox!!

and one more thing, no more branch coding, am sick of branch coding, from now on it’s just tough, W3C standards and nothing else.

Maybe we need a standards group for implementing the standards from the standards group.

]]>
By: Helen Price http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-3760 Helen Price Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:38:01 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-3760 tabs not showing after installing(((( tabs not showing after installing((((

]]>
By: maxyy http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-3379 maxyy Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:06:17 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-3379 http://umora.info/ http://umora.info/

]]>
By: Zak http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1534 Zak Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:45:32 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-1534 Who needs ActiveX Opt-in when developers have to spend many valuable hours and days on guessing what the IE team has implemented and what they have left out. With the comments so far, it doesnt seem anything has changed. Did they ever think of opening their own w3c... Who needs ActiveX Opt-in when developers have to spend many valuable hours and days on guessing what the IE team has implemented and what they have left out.

With the comments so far, it doesnt seem anything has changed.

Did they ever think of opening their own w3c…

]]>
By: Helen, web design manager http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-982 Helen, web design manager Thu, 18 May 2006 10:13:08 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-982 Jose, I think in the whole you are right, but still it has some new features as "ActiveX Opt-in" or Page Zoom. Jose, I think in the whole you are right, but still it has some new features as “ActiveX Opt-in” or Page Zoom.

]]>
By: Deirdre Saoirse Moen » Blog Archive » IE7, Beta 2 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-456 Deirdre Saoirse Moen » Blog Archive » IE7, Beta 2 Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:35:50 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-456 [...] I’m with José Jeria: this feels more like a 6.1 release. [...] [...] I’m with José Jeria: this feels more like a 6.1 release. [...]

]]>
By: Jacobus http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-317 Jacobus Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:15:36 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-317 Even discussing IE is a waist of time. Every web developer knows how much time is waisted and how much functionality is comprimised to make feature rich web sites compatible with IE. It has no compliance to standards. A total "up yours" to anyone not using IE. It's time to stop supporting browsers that does not comply to industry standards. VML and now XAML, when there is already mature standards such as SVG out there! It's just silly! Even discussing IE is a waist of time. Every web developer knows how much time is waisted and how much functionality is comprimised to make feature rich web sites compatible with IE. It has no compliance to standards. A total “up yours” to anyone not using IE.

It’s time to stop supporting browsers that does not comply to industry standards. VML and now XAML, when there is already mature standards such as SVG out there! It’s just silly!

]]>
By: hAl http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-231 hAl Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:59:11 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-231 Those are not important webstandards. They are probably important to you. and for SVG especially. For MS it would probalby be wiser to support their own new scalable vector format XAML in the next generations of IE rather dan going for SVG. That format is the basis for their new Expression web design suite. Especially since their VML format which is incorporated in IE was rejected by W3C due to competitors launching another format which was not supported by any browser at that time. Adding XAML to IE before considering adding SVG support would be a big payback to those competitors that twarted the use of VML. Those are not important webstandards.
They are probably important to you.

and for SVG especially.
For MS it would probalby be wiser to support their own new scalable vector format XAML in the next generations of IE rather dan going for SVG. That format is the basis for their new Expression web design suite.

Especially since their VML format which is incorporated in IE was rejected by W3C due to competitors launching another format which was not supported by any browser at that time.
Adding XAML to IE before considering adding SVG support would be a big payback to those competitors that twarted the use of VML.

]]>
By: James Watcher http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-169 James Watcher Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:09:00 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-169 Cant wait to see the comparative reviews of IE7, Firefox 1.5 or 2.0, Opera 8 or 9, Safari etc. <strong>See who has done the best job of implementing not just CSS and pass ACID2, but also SVG, JavaScript E4X, MathML and other important Web standards</strong> Cant wait to see the comparative reviews of IE7, Firefox 1.5 or 2.0, Opera 8 or 9, Safari etc. See who has done the best job of implementing not just CSS and pass ACID2, but also SVG, JavaScript E4X, MathML and other important Web standards

]]>
By: Adam http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/comment-page-1/#comment-167 Adam Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:55:56 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/2006/03/21/ie-7-beta-preview-2-out-now/#comment-167 Still lacks support of the internet standards Still lacks support of the internet standards

]]>