Comments on: WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed recommendations http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Queensberry http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72620 Queensberry Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:37:43 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72620 thx for the great work bruce. you have to work on the part 2 now ;) thx for the great work bruce. you have to work on the part 2 now ;)

]]>
By: links for 2008-11-20 | Ip's. http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72615 links for 2008-11-20 | Ip's. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:03:26 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72615 [...] WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed recommendations - The Web Standards Project "WCAG 2 and the mobileOK Basic Tests specifications have been moved to “proposed recommendation status” by the W3C, which means that the technical material is complete and it has been implemented in real sites. " (tags: accessibility webstandards WCAG wcag2 release article) [...] [...] WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed recommendations – The Web Standards Project "WCAG 2 and the mobileOK Basic Tests specifications have been moved to “proposed recommendation status” by the W3C, which means that the technical material is complete and it has been implemented in real sites. " (tags: accessibility webstandards WCAG wcag2 release article) [...]

]]>
By: Billigflug http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72601 Billigflug Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:35:24 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72601 Beside all complaints that the WCAG 2 itself isn't accessible for all developers, this document should be added as well: http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/ Sooner or later web developers have to deal with it, this is beyond question. Thus I appreciate to inform developers how to manage the switch to WCAG 2.0. But I really wonder why something that aims to ease peoples life has to be so complicated? Beside all complaints that the WCAG 2 itself isn’t accessible for all developers, this document should be added as well:
http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/
Sooner or later web developers have to deal with it, this is beyond question. Thus I appreciate to inform developers how to manage the switch to WCAG 2.0.
But I really wonder why something that aims to ease peoples life has to be so complicated?

]]>
By: Web Design - ZachBrowne.com http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72585 Web Design - ZachBrowne.com Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:15:03 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72585 [...] 2.0. has now become a proposed recommendation. This means it is not only technically complete but has been successfully implemented on a large [...] [...] 2.0. has now become a proposed recommendation. This means it is not only technically complete but has been successfully implemented on a large [...]

]]>
By: Bruce Lawson’s personal site  : Accessibility and mobile standards; Veerle Pieters interview http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72456 Bruce Lawson’s personal site  : Accessibility and mobile standards; Veerle Pieters interview Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:08:08 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72456 [...] It may be of interest to you that WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed W3C recommendations. [...] [...] It may be of interest to you that WCAG 2 and mobileOK Basic Tests specs are proposed W3C recommendations. [...]

]]>
By: blawson http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72445 blawson Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:12:27 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72445 Of course, Paul: good point. So I've started off a list of <a href="/2008/11/06/wcag-20-resources/" rel="nofollow">recommended WCAG 2 resources</a> for the community to build. Thanks for suggesting it. Of course, Paul: good point. So I’ve started off a list of recommended WCAG 2 resources for the community to build.

Thanks for suggesting it.

]]>
By: nortypig » Blog Archive » WCAG 2 Proposed Recommendation http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72428 nortypig » Blog Archive » WCAG 2 Proposed Recommendation Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:43:59 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72428 [...] WCAG 2 has moved to Proposed Recommendation status and so has the lesser known MobileOK Basic Tests recommendation. The Web Standards Project (WaSP) have posted the announcement. [...] [...] WCAG 2 has moved to Proposed Recommendation status and so has the lesser known MobileOK Basic Tests recommendation. The Web Standards Project (WaSP) have posted the announcement. [...]

]]>
By: Paul D. Waite http://www.webstandards.org/2008/11/04/wcag-2-and-mobileok-basic-tests-specs-are-proposed-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-72427 Paul D. Waite Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:02:21 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1160#comment-72427 <blockquote>But if your site was developed with an eye to real accessibility for real people rather than as a compliance issue, you should find that there is little difference.</blockquote> Your clients might start asking about WCAG 2 though.

But if your site was developed with an eye to real accessibility for real people rather than as a compliance issue, you should find that there is little difference.

Your clients might start asking about WCAG 2 though.

]]>