Comments on: Purpose of Conficker Worm Uncovered http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/ Working together for standards Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:19:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: conficker http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-74085 conficker Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:20:48 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-74085 Laugh, but wait...hah, hah, hah Laugh, but wait…hah, hah, hah

]]>
By: coffee http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73901 coffee Sat, 04 Apr 2009 05:55:53 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73901 it would seem that the Conficker worm didn't end up causing as much damage as many feared it would seem that the Conficker worm didn’t end up causing as much damage as many feared

]]>
By: Just http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73877 Just Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:32:54 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73877 Wonderful!! ah ah Wonderful!! ah ah

]]>
By: John http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73873 John Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:32:22 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73873 Brilliant, I almost believed it for a minute! Brilliant, I almost believed it for a minute!

]]>
By: F. Andy Seidl http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73871 F. Andy Seidl Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:29:19 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73871 But, have you seen this? Digital Altruism: Conficker Payload Less Severe than Expected, Actually Does Good <a href="http://tinyurl.com/czbsk8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/czbsk8</a> But, have you seen this?

Digital Altruism: Conficker Payload Less Severe than Expected, Actually Does Good
http://tinyurl.com/czbsk8

]]>
By: TP http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73869 TP Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:06:43 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73869 “your document.all are belong to us.” CLASSIC! ROFLMAO “your document.all are belong to us.” CLASSIC! ROFLMAO

]]>
By: Chris http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73866 Chris Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:28:38 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73866 All sites are non-compliant. Resistance is futile. You will comply. All sites are non-compliant. Resistance is futile. You will comply.

]]>
By: Dave Mosher http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73864 Dave Mosher Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:30:23 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73864 Bwaha, made my day :) Bwaha, made my day :)

]]>
By: aljuk http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73863 aljuk Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:22:17 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73863 I heartily LOL'd! I heartily LOL’d!

]]>
By: DC http://www.webstandards.org/2009/04/01/purpose-of-conficker-worm-uncovered/comment-page-1/#comment-73862 DC Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:22:30 +0000 http://www.webstandards.org/?p=1702#comment-73862 Put out another one saying it will wipe the hard drives of all IE6 users! Put out another one saying it will wipe the hard drives of all IE6 users!

]]>