Comments on: HTML5 logo: be proud, but don’t muddy the waters!

By: Stacy Jackson

Stacy Jackson — Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:08:42 +0000

I think the logo is a good idea. To me its marketing 101 and even an open technology needs marketing to quicken the adaptation.

]]>

By: Ajeet

Ajeet — Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:54:54 +0000

Glad to see that all our protests have not gone unheard and that w3c is making amends already.

]]>

By: What is HTML5? « Your home for HTML5 news, tutorials and examples

What is HTML5? « Your home for HTML5 news, tutorials and examples — Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:45:09 +0000

[...] it’s not really an HTML5-logo is it? The Web Standards Project has also criticized the logo with an open letter to the W3C, and I can honestly understand what they are concerned about. HTML5 is becoming a term for anything [...]

]]>

By: HTML5 logo: W3C takes a step in the right direction - The Web Standards Project

HTML5 logo: W3C takes a step in the right direction - The Web Standards Project — Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:32:12 +0000

[...] receiving a wave of negative feedback concerning the HTML5 logo, the W3C have made steps towards righting things. If you read the HTML5 logo FAQ, you’ll see [...]

]]>

By: Ajeet

Ajeet — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:00:58 +0000

It is one thing to make an HTML logo to act as a general symbol, akin to the RSS symbol. It is another to try to establish supremacy in terms of who owns what technology. That is what is happening here, I think.

]]>

By: Web round up #13: What people are saying about the new HTML5 logo | Mayfield Digital Blog

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:10:51 +0000

[...] piss-coloured fleck of no importance to clog-up the footer of a website the rest of the time though.The Web Standards Project:Without being able to draw clear distinctions between technologies, clear communication about those [...]

]]>

By: Exactly what is HTML5? | HasGeek Blog

Exactly what is HTML5? | HasGeek Blog — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:11:27 +0000

[...] Mills says, don’t muddy the waters (via Shwetank Dixit): This really isn’t good—I appreciate that it is good to have an umbrella [...]

]]>

By: Hamish Rouse

Hamish Rouse — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 22:33:58 +0000

You know something, if we need a name for name sake – instead of HTML5 like W3C has come out with, why not “WAKA”/”Web AKA” or “Web Also Known As”

Its the web that uses various technologies… Just a thought…

Good letter tho.

Hammy

]]>

By: Jimmi

Jimmi — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:39:21 +0000

We [developers] never needed a term to refer to “XHTML 1.0 plus CSS2.1” or “HTML4.01 plus JavaScript” or “any combination of front-end technologies.” Why this sudden all-conquering need for a term that covers so many different technologies as to be completely meaningless?

Does “three-legged stool” ring any bells?

]]>

By: The “Open Web Stack” – Snappy acronym needed | AlastairC

The “Open Web Stack” – Snappy acronym needed | AlastairC — Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:13:55 +0000

[...] Mills at the Web Standards project posted up an open letter to the W3C about the new “HTML5 logo“, which I commented on, but it seems comments are off. So [...]

]]>